Skip to main content

Postfix to Infix Conversion

Problem Statement:​

You are given a string that represents the postfix form of a valid mathematical expression. Convert it to its infix form.

  • Example:

    Example:

    Input:
    ab*c+
    Output:
    ((a*b)+c)
    Explanation:
    The above output is its valid infix form.

Solution: Stack-Based Expression Building (Postfix to Infix Conversion)​

// User function Template for C++

#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;

class Solution {
public:
string postToInfix(string exp) {
stack<string> st;
int length = exp.size();

for (int i = 0; i < length; i++) {
char currentChar = exp[i];

// If operand, push it as a string
if (isalnum(currentChar)) {
st.push(string(1, currentChar));
}
// If operator, pop two operands and combine
else {
string operand2 = st.top();
st.pop();
string operand1 = st.top();
st.pop();

string combined = "(" + operand1 + currentChar + operand2 + ")";
st.push(combined);
}
}

return st.top();
}
};


📝 How It Works​

  • Initialize a stack of strings.
  • Iterate through each character in the postfix expression:
    • If it's an alphanumeric character (operand), push it as a string onto the stack.
    • If it's an operator:
      • Pop two elements from the stack (operand2 first, operand1 second).
      • Create a new string in the format (operand1 operator operand2).
      • Push the new string back onto the stack.
  • Final Result: The stack will have one string representing the fully parenthesized infix expression.

🧩 Key Formula / Recurrence​

  • No recurrence relation.
  • Stack operation rule:
    • stack.push("(" + operand1 + operator + operand2 + ")")

⏱️ Time & Space Complexity​

Complexity TypeValue
TimeO(N)
SpaceO(N)

Where N is the length of the input postfix expression.

  • Stack stores at most N/2 combined strings at once (in the worst case).

⚠️ Edge Cases​

  • Empty string input → Should return an empty string or handle as invalid input.
  • Single operand input → Should return the operand itself.
  • Postfix string with invalid sequence (e.g., too many operators or operands) → Not handled in this simple implementation; assumes valid input.

💡 Other Approaches​

ApproachRemarks
Recursive ParsingPossible but unnecessarily complex for postfix expressions.
Building Tree + Inorder TraversalBuild expression tree first, then convert using traversal. Space-heavy. Stack is simpler and faster.

  • Infix to Postfix Conversion
  • Prefix to Infix Conversion
  • Evaluate Postfix Expression
  • Construct Binary Expression Tree from Postfix
  • Reverse Polish Notation Calculator

🛠️ Other Notes​

  • Real-world analogy: Think of a postfix expression like instructions where you always apply the latest operator to the last two items in your clipboard stack.
  • Why parentheses? Parentheses ensure operator precedence is preserved in the infix form.
🚀 Level Up Your Engineering Mindset

Never Study in Isolation. Join Binary Dose.

Connect with fellow engineers, clear conceptual doubts, and get 2 visual breakdowns & engineering mental models daily across our community channels.

Discord
Official Hub

Discord Community

Start at #welcome-and-rules, say hello in #general-chat, clear doubts, and collaborate with engineers worldwide.

Join Discord Server→
⚡
Daily Knowledge Drops

Daily Visual Deep-Dives

Bite-sized system design schematics, core OS internals, and DSA intuition served right into your feeds every single day.

💡Have handwritten notes, cheat-sheets, or want to publish a technical article?
Learn How to Contribute→